| | | | | | |

Core i7-8565U vs Ryzen 3 5300U


Description
The i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8565U gets a score of 142.5 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806eb
860f81
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2018
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.83k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.55k points
198.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8565U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.2k
15.09k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
23.47k
23.74k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
8.32k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
5.19k (x0.42)
TOTAL
67.83k
52.35k (x0.77)

Multithread

i7-8565U

5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
64.33k
67k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
58.47k
89.94k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.82k
36.84k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.93k
4.6k (x1.17)
TOTAL
142.55k
198.38k (x1.39)

Performance/W
i7-8565U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
4288 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3898 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1055 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
262 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
9503 points/W
13226 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8565U
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5103 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1067 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2663 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
14746 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4