| | | | | | |

Core i7-8550U vs i5-4200U


Description
The i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-4200U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8550U gets a score of 166.1 k points while the i5-4200U gets 57.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8550U is 2.9 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
40651
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2017
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
64.2k points
28.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
166.12k points
57.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8550U
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
14.74k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.6k
7.75k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
3.27k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.1k
3.09k (x0.28)
TOTAL
64.2k
28.85k (x0.45)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
72.82k
27.66k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
71.71k
18.65k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.35k
7.17k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.36k (x1.03)
TOTAL
166.12k
57.84k (x0.35)

Performance/W
i7-8550U
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4855 points/W
1844 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4781 points/W
1243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
291 points/W
TOTAL
11075 points/W
3856 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8550U
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6343 points/GHz
5669 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5650 points/GHz
2980 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1260 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2774 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
TOTAL
16049 points/GHz
11095 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4