| | | | | | |

Core i7-8550U vs i5-10600K


Description
The i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8550U gets a score of 166.1 k points while the i5-10600K gets 365.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 2.2 times faster than the i7-8550U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
a0655
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.2k points
74.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
166.12k points
365.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8550U
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
30.27k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
22.6k
26.42k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
6.07k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.1k
11.33k (x1.02)
TOTAL
64.2k
74.09k (x1.15)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
72.82k
164.69k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
71.71k
156.45k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.35k
37.39k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
7.15k (x1.69)
TOTAL
166.12k
365.67k (x2.2)

Performance/W
i7-8550U
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
4855 points/W
1317 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4781 points/W
1252 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
11075 points/W
2925 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8550U
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
6343 points/GHz
6306 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5650 points/GHz
5505 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2774 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
16049 points/GHz
15436 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4