| | | | | | |

Core i7-8550U vs i5-10400T


Description
The i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8550U gets a score of 166.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.8 times faster than the i7-8550U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.2k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
166.12k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-8550U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
4k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
15.98k
14.19k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
4.62k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.05k
11.03k (x1)
TOTAL
36.05k
33.84k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.76k
22.77k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
50.15k
96.59k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.76k
31.65k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
2.45k (x0.59)
TOTAL
82.84k
153.46k (x1.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-8550U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
12.61k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.59k
17.94k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
4.83k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
10.81k (x1.03)
TOTAL
49.41k
46.19k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
41.11k
74.62k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
65.04k
119.63k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.53k
32.65k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.22k
2.52k (x0.6)
TOTAL
127.9k
229.42k (x1.79)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-8550U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.15k
12.5k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
19.05k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
4.72k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.21k
10.3k (x1.12)
TOTAL
47.16k
46.57k (x0.99)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
34.13k
74.58k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
53.79k
126.96k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.91k
31.76k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
2.5k (x0.61)
TOTAL
105.95k
235.8k (x2.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8550U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
22k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.6k
19.98k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
4.57k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.1k
11.31k (x1.02)
TOTAL
64.2k
57.85k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-8550U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
72.82k
136.69k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
71.71k
135.25k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.35k
32.76k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
2.48k (x0.58)
TOTAL
166.12k
307.18k (x1.85)

Performance/W
i7-8550U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4855 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4781 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
11075 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8550U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6343 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5650 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2774 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
16049 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4