| | | | | | |

Core i7-8550U vs Celeron N5100


Description
The i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8550U gets a score of 127.9 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8550U is 1.4 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.2k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
166.12k points
89.82k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-8550U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
9.74k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
20.59k
9.84k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
3.89k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
3.51k (x0.34)
TOTAL
49.41k
26.98k (x0.55)

Multithread

i7-8550U

N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
41.11k
34.19k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
65.04k
36.28k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.53k
15.3k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.22k
4.05k (x0.96)
TOTAL
127.9k
89.82k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i7-8550U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
2741 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4336 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1169 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
281 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
8527 points/W
14970 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8550U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
3232 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5147 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1353 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2620 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
12351 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4