| | | | | | |

Core i7-8086K vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 3 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a20f12
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/32
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
June 2018
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.4k points
1060.62k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8086K
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.74k
19.88k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
25.31k
25.26k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
10.77k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.12k
23.59k (x1.8)
TOTAL
72.95k
79.51k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-8086K

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
160.53k
349.53k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
147.29k
470.67k (x3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.65k
207.28k (x5.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
33.13k (x3.71)
TOTAL
352.4k
1060.62k (x3.01)

Performance/W
i7-8086K
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1690 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
375 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
3709 points/W
10101 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8086K
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5748 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5063 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
14590 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4