| | | | | | |

Core i7-8086K vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-8086K gets a score of 352.4 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.4k points
410.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-8086K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.74k
15.02k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
25.31k
24.26k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
5.53k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.12k
16.26k (x1.24)
TOTAL
72.95k
61.07k (x0.84)

Multithread

i7-8086K

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
160.53k
122.92k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
147.29k
220.32k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.65k
59.78k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.92k
7.44k (x0.83)
TOTAL
352.4k
410.47k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i7-8086K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1690 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
375 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3709 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-8086K
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5748 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5063 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2624 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
14590 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4