Core i7-7820HQ vs Xeon E5-2690 v3
Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 5.2 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 5.2 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
306f2
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
1016.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
20.96k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
11.74k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.61k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
3.4k (x0.43)
TOTAL
55.85k
40.71k (x0.73)
Multithread
i7-7820HQ
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
531.68k (x6.22)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
342.28k (x3.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
133.22k (x6.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
9.19k (x2.57)
TOTAL
196.55k
1016.36k (x5.17)
Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
7529 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4