Core i7-7820HQ vs i7-4710HQ
Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-4710HQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the i7-4710HQ gets 155.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the i7-4710HQ gets 155.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4710HQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
45 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
40.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
155.24k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
20.98k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
10.48k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.75k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
4.44k (x0.56)
TOTAL
55.85k
40.65k (x0.73)
Multithread
i7-7820HQ
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
77.73k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
52.12k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
20.55k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
4.85k (x1.36)
TOTAL
196.55k
155.24k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
3303 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
i7-4710HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
5994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
2993 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
11614 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4