Core i7-7820HQ vs i5-8500T
Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the i5-8500T gets 251.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the i5-8500T gets 251.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
906ea
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
59.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
251.82k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
23.13k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
20.7k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.71k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
10.73k (x1.36)
TOTAL
55.85k
59.27k (x1.06)
Multithread
i7-7820HQ
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
125.17k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
98.07k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
25.57k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.01k (x0.84)
TOTAL
196.55k
251.82k (x1.28)
Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
3576 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
2802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
731 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
7195 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
6608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
16934 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4