Core i7-7820HQ vs i5-8265U
Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
806eb
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
149.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
24.32k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
20.35k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.38k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
8.52k (x1.08)
TOTAL
55.85k
57.57k (x1.03)
Multithread
i7-7820HQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
65.17k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
63.6k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
14.4k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
6.31k (x1.77)
TOTAL
196.55k
149.48k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
9965 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4