| | | | | | |

Core i7-7820HQ vs i5-4440


Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-4440 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the i5-4440 gets 138.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
38.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
138.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
19.08k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
10.47k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.53k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
4.21k (x0.53)
TOTAL
55.85k
38.29k (x0.69)

Multithread

i7-7820HQ

i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
73.26k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
41.01k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
17.12k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
7.3k (x2.04)
TOTAL
196.55k
138.69k (x0.71)

Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
872 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
488 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
204 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
1651 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
5783 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
3174 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
11604 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4