Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 5 5600X
Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 2.2 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 2.2 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a20f10
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2017
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
435.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
23.28k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
25.58k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
11.72k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
25.45k (x3.21)
TOTAL
55.85k
86.03k (x1.54)
Multithread
i7-7820HQ
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
135.28k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
180.56k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
80.27k (x3.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
38.94k (x10.9)
TOTAL
196.55k
435.05k (x2.21)
Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
6693 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4