Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.4 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.4 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
140.97k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
10.88k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
18.09k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.29k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
3.36k (x0.42)
TOTAL
55.85k
36.64k (x0.66)
Multithread
i7-7820HQ
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
42.44k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
73.82k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
20.76k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.96k (x1.11)
TOTAL
196.55k
140.97k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
9398 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4