Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
14.48k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
23.84k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
5.43k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
5.46k (x0.69)
TOTAL
55.85k
49.21k (x0.88)
Multithread
i7-7820HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
54.39k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
88.77k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
20.04k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
5.48k (x1.53)
TOTAL
196.55k
168.69k (x0.86)
Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4