Core i7-7820HQ vs A8 9600
Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9600 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 2.1 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 2.1 times faster than the 9600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
660f51
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
32.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
92.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
11.66k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
14.96k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
3.33k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
2.8k (x0.35)
TOTAL
55.85k
32.75k (x0.59)
Multithread
i7-7820HQ
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
38.61k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
38.92k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
11.57k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.43k (x0.96)
TOTAL
196.55k
92.52k (x0.47)
Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
594 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
599 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
178 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
1423 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
4400 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
979 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
9632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4