| | | | | | |

Core i7-7820HQ vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
90675
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
399.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
33.85k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
20.33k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
10.51k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
11.77k (x1.49)
TOTAL
55.85k
76.46k (x1.37)

Multithread

i7-7820HQ

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
174.21k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
141.31k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
64.86k (x3.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
19.01k (x5.32)
TOTAL
196.55k
399.39k (x2.03)

Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4