| | | | | | |

Core i7-7820HQ vs i7-1185G7


Description
The i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7820HQ gets a score of 196.6 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.85k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
196.55k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7820HQ
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
23.23k
24.35k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
20.07k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
8.61k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
7.84k (x0.99)
TOTAL
55.85k
60.87k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-7820HQ

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
85.54k
93.58k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
87.07k
94.71k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.37k
33.28k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
9.34k (x2.61)
TOTAL
196.55k
230.91k (x1.17)

Performance/W
i7-7820HQ
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1935 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
4368 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7820HQ
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5956 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5163 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1172 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2030 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
14321 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4