Core i7-7700HQ vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 169.2 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 169.2 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
206d7
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
13k
6.95k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
20.34k
6.24k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
3.05k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.95k
2.56k (x0.37)
TOTAL
45.05k
18.8k (x0.42)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
52.7k
90.01k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
89.69k
82.43k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.49k
42.59k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
9.66k (x2.25)
TOTAL
169.17k
224.7k (x1.33)
Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
1171 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1993 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
500 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
3421 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5351 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1255 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1829 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
11857 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4