Core i7-7700HQ vs i5-4200U
Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-4200U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i5-4200U gets 57.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 3.6 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the i5-4200U gets 57.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 3.6 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
40651
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
28.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
57.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
14.74k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
7.75k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
3.27k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
3.09k (x0.39)
TOTAL
56.29k
28.85k (x0.51)
Multithread
i7-7700HQ
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
27.66k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
18.65k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
7.17k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
4.36k (x0.89)
TOTAL
208.33k
57.84k (x0.28)
Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
1844 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
1243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
291 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
3856 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
5669 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
2980 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1260 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
11095 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4