| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700HQ vs Ryzen 7 5700G


Description
The i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5700G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700HQ gets a score of 208.3 k points while the 5700G gets 484.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 2.3 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.29k points
84.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
208.33k points
484.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700HQ
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.27k
22.99k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
25.24k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
11.56k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.92k
24.7k (x3.12)
TOTAL
56.29k
84.49k (x1.5)

Multithread

i7-7700HQ

5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
93.11k
159.36k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
89.03k
215.57k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.29k
98.78k (x4.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.9k
10.4k (x2.12)
TOTAL
208.33k
484.11k (x2.32)

Performance/W
i7-7700HQ
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
2069 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1978 points/W
3316 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
1520 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
4629 points/W
7448 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700HQ
5700G
Test#1 (Integers)
6124 points/GHz
4998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5354 points/GHz
5487 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2083 points/GHz
5369 points/GHz
TOTAL
14813 points/GHz
18367 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4