Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.33k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.52k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
26.7k
14.87k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.7k
21.53k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.46k
8.39k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.48k
8.21k (x0.72)
TOTAL
67.33k
53k (x0.79)
Multithread
i7-7700
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
115.97k
124.63k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
158.62k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.28k
69.79k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
7.53k (x1.1)
TOTAL
257.52k
360.57k (x1.4)
Performance/W
i7-7700
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1784 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1668 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
105 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
3962 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6356 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5643 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2733 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
16032 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4