| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 3 5300U


Description
The i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 1.3 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
860f81
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.33k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.52k points
198.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.7k
15.09k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.7k
23.74k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.46k
8.32k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.48k
5.19k (x0.45)
TOTAL
67.33k
52.35k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-7700

5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
115.97k
67k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
89.94k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.28k
36.84k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
4.6k (x0.67)
TOTAL
257.52k
198.38k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i7-7700
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1784 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1668 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
105 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
3962 points/W
13226 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6356 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5643 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2733 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
16032 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4