| | | | | | |

Core i7-7660U vs Ryzen 5 5500


Description
The i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5500 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500 is 2.8 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
57.46k points
80.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.81k points
373.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7660U
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
22.09k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
19.29k
24.59k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
10.94k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.94k
22.89k (x2.09)
TOTAL
57.46k
80.52k (x1.4)

Multithread

i7-7660U

5500
Test#1 (Integers)
56.67k
124.44k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
46.95k
167.06k (x3.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.36k
74.34k (x6.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.84k
7.2k (x0.43)
TOTAL
132.81k
373.05k (x2.81)

Performance/W
i7-7660U
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
3778 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3130 points/W
2570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
1144 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
8854 points/W
5739 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7660U
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
5614 points/GHz
5261 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4823 points/GHz
5855 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
2604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2735 points/GHz
5451 points/GHz
TOTAL
14365 points/GHz
19170 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4