Core i7-7660U vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7660U is 2.2 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7660U is 2.2 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.46k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.81k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7660U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
11.13k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
19.29k
19.38k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
4.47k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.94k
3.87k (x0.35)
TOTAL
57.46k
38.85k (x0.68)
Multithread
i7-7660U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
56.67k
17.13k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
46.95k
30.56k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.36k
9.44k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.84k
4.09k (x0.24)
TOTAL
132.81k
61.23k (x0.46)
Performance/W
i7-7660U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3778 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3130 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
8854 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7660U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5614 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4823 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2735 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
14365 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4