| | | | | | |

Core i7-7660U vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 8.7 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
b0671
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
2/4
24/32
TDP
15 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
57.46k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.81k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7660U
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
53.69k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
19.29k
28.76k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
14.93k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.94k
15.47k (x1.41)
TOTAL
57.46k
112.85k (x1.96)

Multithread

i7-7660U

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
56.67k
526.44k (x9.29)
Test#2 (FP)
46.95k
420.48k (x8.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.36k
196.13k (x15.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.84k
17.68k (x1.05)
TOTAL
132.81k
1160.72k (x8.74)

Performance/W
i7-7660U
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3778 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3130 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
8854 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7660U
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5614 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4823 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2735 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
14365 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4