| | | | | | |

Core i7-7660U vs i3-13100F


Description
The i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 2.9 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
b06f5
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
57.46k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.81k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7660U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
47.14k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.29k
25.77k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
13.25k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.94k
14.77k (x1.35)
TOTAL
57.46k
100.94k (x1.76)

Multithread

i7-7660U

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
56.67k
168.51k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
46.95k
142.8k (x3.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.36k
63.57k (x5.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.84k
15.34k (x0.91)
TOTAL
132.81k
390.23k (x2.94)

Performance/W
i7-7660U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3778 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3130 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
8854 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7660U
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5614 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4823 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2735 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
14365 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4