| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs Xeon L5430


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the L5430 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 88.4 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7560U is 1.7 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
1067a
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket 771
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
50 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2008
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
15.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
51.64k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
3.09k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
6.86k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
2.66k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
3.01k (x0.34)
TOTAL
45.24k
15.62k (x0.35)

Multithread

i7-7560U

L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
12.4k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
27.27k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
10.41k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
1.57k (x0.1)
TOTAL
88.42k
51.64k (x0.58)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
1536 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2671 points/W
545 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
672 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1016 points/W
31 points/W
TOTAL
5894 points/W
1033 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
3364 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4946 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1241 points/GHz
996 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2355 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
11905 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4