Core i7-7560U vs Xeon E5-1660 v4
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 89 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 89 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
406f1
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
320.49k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
12.41k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
17.23k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
4.89k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
3.07k (x0.34)
TOTAL
46.02k
37.6k (x0.82)
Multithread
i7-7560U
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
102.11k (x4.44)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
156.5k (x3.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
42.08k (x4.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
19.8k (x1.33)
TOTAL
89.03k
320.49k (x3.6)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1533 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
661 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
5935 points/W
2289 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5268 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1092 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
12111 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4