| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 3.8 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.3k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
16.56k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
5.25k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
12.61k (x1.42)
TOTAL
29.09k
38.72k (x1.33)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
18.1k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
79.16k (x2.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
26.75k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
13.81k (x0.94)
TOTAL
59.51k
137.82k (x2.32)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
26.28k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
23.38k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.52k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
12.96k (x1.67)
TOTAL
48.16k
68.14k (x1.41)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
163.67k (x4.18)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
159.74k (x4.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
39k (x4.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
7.56k (x0.69)
TOTAL
97.27k
369.97k (x3.8)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4