Core i7-7560U vs i3-8100
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 2.1 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 2.1 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
906eb
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
200.4k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
3.72k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
15.33k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
4.71k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
6.76k (x0.76)
TOTAL
29.09k
30.52k (x1.05)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
14.48k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
59.59k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
18.07k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
4.3k (x0.29)
TOTAL
59.51k
96.43k (x1.62)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
13.51k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
19.38k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.06k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
7.87k (x0.88)
TOTAL
45.24k
45.81k (x1.01)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
52.88k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
75.92k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
19.52k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
4.53k (x0.3)
TOTAL
88.42k
152.86k (x1.73)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
13.52k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
20.57k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
4.96k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
7.91k (x0.88)
TOTAL
46.02k
46.96k (x1.02)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
53.4k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
80.87k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
19.03k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
4.29k (x0.29)
TOTAL
89.03k
157.59k (x1.77)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
24.47k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
21.52k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
4.95k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
8.24k (x1.06)
TOTAL
48.16k
59.18k (x1.23)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
92.86k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
83.05k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
18.55k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
5.93k (x0.54)
TOTAL
97.27k
200.4k (x2.06)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
3083 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
16438 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4