| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i3-10100T


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.3 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
227.67k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.32k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
15.7k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
5.04k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
7.68k (x0.86)
TOTAL
29.09k
32.73k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
16.59k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
71.1k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
23.26k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
3.86k (x0.26)
TOTAL
59.51k
114.81k (x1.93)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
13.84k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
19.79k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
5.28k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
8.31k (x0.93)
TOTAL
45.24k
47.22k (x1.04)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
54.67k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
90.71k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
24.11k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
3.85k (x0.25)
TOTAL
88.42k
173.34k (x1.96)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
13.88k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
20.94k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
5.18k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
8.2k (x0.91)
TOTAL
46.02k
48.19k (x1.05)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
54.88k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
93.17k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
23.34k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
3.85k (x0.26)
TOTAL
89.03k
175.24k (x1.97)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
24.31k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
22.15k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.14k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
8.46k (x1.09)
TOTAL
48.16k
60.06k (x1.25)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
101.48k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
98.04k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
24.28k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
3.86k (x0.35)
TOTAL
97.27k
227.67k (x2.34)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4