Core i7-7560U vs i3-10100
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.7 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.7 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
22.74k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
20.31k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
4.71k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
7.65k (x0.99)
TOTAL
48.16k
55.41k (x1.15)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
71.95k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
67.7k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
16.43k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
6.25k (x0.57)
TOTAL
97.27k
162.33k (x1.67)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4