Core i7-7560U vs i7-11800H (ES)
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 7.3 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 7.3 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
806d0
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
709.85k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.4k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
20.25k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
11.69k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
11.66k (x1.31)
TOTAL
29.09k
48.01k (x1.65)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
38.93k (x6.14)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
191.89k (x6.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
108.8k (x12.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
14.95k (x1.02)
TOTAL
59.51k
354.57k (x5.96)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
15.22k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
25.2k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
12.66k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
11.66k (x1.3)
TOTAL
45.24k
64.74k (x1.43)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
155.37k (x6.74)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
260.27k (x6.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
115.37k (x11.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
20.04k (x1.32)
TOTAL
88.42k
551.04k (x6.23)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
17.25k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
25.53k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
12.56k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
11.4k (x1.27)
TOTAL
46.02k
66.74k (x1.45)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
144.5k (x6.28)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
243.41k (x5.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
109.02k (x10.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
16k (x1.07)
TOTAL
89.03k
512.94k (x5.76)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
30.84k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
26.38k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
12.66k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
11.74k (x1.51)
TOTAL
48.16k
81.62k (x1.69)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
294.86k (x7.53)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
280.92k (x7.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
113.9k (x12.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
20.16k (x1.84)
TOTAL
97.27k
709.85k (x7.3)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
15774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4