Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 5.7 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 5.7 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a70f41
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Phoenix
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
32.74k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
27.35k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
14.23k (x3.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
27.41k (x3.54)
TOTAL
48.16k
101.73k (x2.11)
Multithread
i7-7560U
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
236.69k (x6.04)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
202.63k (x5.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
102.8k (x11.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
11.28k (x1.03)
TOTAL
97.27k
553.41k (x5.69)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4