Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 7.1 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 7.1 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
870f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
687.5k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.39k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
16.99k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
7.74k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
24.57k (x2.76)
TOTAL
29.09k
53.69k (x1.85)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
48.45k (x7.65)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
230.81k (x7.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
122.82k (x13.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
54.73k (x3.72)
TOTAL
59.51k
456.8k (x7.68)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
16.59k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
24.55k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
8.55k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
26.28k (x2.94)
TOTAL
45.24k
75.97k (x1.68)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
181.33k (x7.87)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
261.01k (x6.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
126.62k (x12.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
66.64k (x4.37)
TOTAL
88.42k
635.6k (x7.19)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
16.16k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
23.75k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
9.32k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
23.17k (x2.58)
TOTAL
46.02k
72.4k (x1.57)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
174.73k (x7.6)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
275.63k (x6.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
125.65k (x12.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
44.17k (x2.96)
TOTAL
89.03k
620.18k (x6.97)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
16.85k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
26.03k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
9.54k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
22.55k (x2.91)
TOTAL
48.16k
74.97k (x1.56)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
229.41k (x5.86)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
292.81k (x7.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
128.48k (x14.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
36.8k (x3.36)
TOTAL
97.27k
687.5k (x7.07)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4