| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 3.8 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
372.73k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
12.5k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
22.92k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
5.45k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
14.72k (x1.64)
TOTAL
46.02k
55.59k (x1.21)

Multithread

i7-7560U

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
92.51k (x4.02)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
144.76k (x3.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
54.43k (x5.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
22.08k (x1.48)
TOTAL
89.03k
313.78k (x3.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
13.72k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
22.48k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.12k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
15.44k (x1.99)
TOTAL
48.16k
56.76k (x1.18)

Multithread

i7-7560U

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
110.92k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
200.56k (x5.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
54.24k (x6.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
7.01k (x0.64)
TOTAL
97.27k
372.73k (x3.83)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4