| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 4.1 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
90675
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
7.43k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
18.64k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
13.15k (x3.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
14.82k (x1.67)
TOTAL
29.09k
54.04k (x1.86)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
36.23k (x5.72)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
134.76k (x4.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
84.06k (x9.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
16.71k (x1.14)
TOTAL
59.51k
271.76k (x4.57)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
24.18k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
23.85k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
14.42k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
14.87k (x1.66)
TOTAL
45.24k
77.32k (x1.71)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
122.98k (x5.34)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
168.77k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
96.11k (x9.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
16.32k (x1.07)
TOTAL
88.42k
404.19k (x4.57)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
24.24k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
24.74k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
13.95k (x3.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
14.47k (x1.61)
TOTAL
46.02k
77.41k (x1.68)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
126.87k (x5.52)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
186.48k (x4.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
92.37k (x9.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
15.45k (x1.04)
TOTAL
89.03k
421.18k (x4.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
33.85k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
20.33k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
10.51k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
11.77k (x1.52)
TOTAL
48.16k
76.46k (x1.59)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
174.21k (x4.45)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
141.31k (x3.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
64.86k (x7.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
19.01k (x1.73)
TOTAL
97.27k
399.39k (x4.11)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4