Core i7-7560U vs i5-12400
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 5.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 5.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
90672
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Arder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
544.64k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
7.51k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
18.66k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
13.32k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
14.8k (x1.67)
TOTAL
29.09k
54.29k (x1.87)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
35.52k (x5.61)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
138.43k (x4.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
85.55k (x9.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
21.72k (x1.48)
TOTAL
59.51k
281.22k (x4.73)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
24.24k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
23.92k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
14.43k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
14.84k (x1.66)
TOTAL
45.24k
77.43k (x1.71)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
124.33k (x5.4)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
168.8k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
100k (x9.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
21.2k (x1.39)
TOTAL
88.42k
414.33k (x4.69)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
23.84k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
25.09k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
14.1k (x3.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
14.48k (x1.61)
TOTAL
46.02k
77.51k (x1.68)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
123.98k (x5.39)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
176.89k (x4.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
97.42k (x9.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
20.78k (x1.39)
TOTAL
89.03k
419.07k (x4.71)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
48.08k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
25.6k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
14.02k (x3.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
14.81k (x1.91)
TOTAL
48.16k
102.51k (x2.13)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
230.14k (x5.88)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
198.07k (x5.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
94.78k (x10.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
21.64k (x1.97)
TOTAL
97.27k
544.64k (x5.6)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
8379 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4