| | | | | | |

Core i7-7500U vs Celeron N5105


Description
The i7-7500U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7500U gets a score of 87 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7500U is 1.4 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
48.67k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
86.94k points
64.09k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7500U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
9.83k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
9.74k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.03k
3.65k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.16k
3.88k (x0.63)
TOTAL
42.75k
27.1k (x0.63)

Multithread

i7-7500U

N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
27.13k
25.04k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
43.19k
24.7k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.7k
9.29k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
5.06k (x1.01)
TOTAL
87.02k
64.09k (x0.74)

Performance/W
i7-7500U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1809 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2880 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
5801 points/W
6409 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7500U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3695 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5322 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1437 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1761 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
12215 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4