Core i7-6820HQ vs Xeon E5-2690 v3
Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 4.9 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 4.9 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306f2
Core
Skylake-H
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2015
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
1016.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
20.96k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
11.74k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
4.61k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
3.4k (x0.55)
TOTAL
50.1k
40.71k (x0.81)
Multithread
i7-6820HQ
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
531.68k (x5.79)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
342.28k (x3.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
133.22k (x6.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
9.19k (x1.46)
TOTAL
205.89k
1016.36k (x4.94)
Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
7529 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4