Core i7-6820HQ vs i5-10400F
Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.9 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.9 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0655
Core
Skylake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16386 kB
Date
October 2015
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
28.39k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
24.89k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
5.78k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
13.19k (x2.14)
TOTAL
50.1k
72.25k (x1.44)
Multithread
i7-6820HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
180.2k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
163.51k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
40.6k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
6.48k (x1.03)
TOTAL
205.89k
390.78k (x1.9)
Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4