| | | | | | |

Core i7-6820HQ vs i5-1038NG7


Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2015
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
23.2k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
21.2k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
9.4k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
11.54k (x1.88)
TOTAL
50.1k
65.35k (x1.3)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
94.68k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
103.38k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
35.79k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
9.33k (x1.48)
TOTAL
205.89k
243.18k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4