| | | | | | |

Core i7-6820HQ vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2015
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.18k
4.05k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
13.02k
15.29k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.17k
9.04k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
10.54k (x1.52)
TOTAL
27.3k
38.92k (x1.43)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.26k
9.05k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
62.23k
33.88k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.34k
15.34k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
6.74k (x1.23)
TOTAL
101.29k
65.01k (x0.64)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
7.07k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
10.55k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
5.27k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.27k
5.66k (x0.78)
TOTAL
40.01k
28.56k (x0.71)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
48.5k
25.28k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
77.02k
37.48k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.3k
17.77k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.24k
6.92k (x1.32)
TOTAL
152.06k
87.45k (x0.58)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.78k
13.9k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
18.06k
20.13k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.48k
9.41k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.12k
10.59k (x1.49)
TOTAL
41.44k
54.03k (x1.3)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
49.46k
55.4k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
84.8k
59.01k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.7k
22.83k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
6.7k (x1.4)
TOTAL
159.73k
143.94k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
25.53k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
19.99k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
9.31k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
10.81k (x1.76)
TOTAL
50.1k
65.64k (x1.31)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
58.46k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
57.31k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
20.1k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
6.81k (x1.08)
TOTAL
205.89k
142.69k (x0.69)

Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4