Core i7-6820HQ vs Celeron N5105
Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 152.1 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 2.4 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 152.1 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 2.4 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
906c0
Core
Skylake-H
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2015
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
9.83k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
9.74k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
3.65k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.27k
3.88k (x0.53)
TOTAL
40.01k
27.1k (x0.68)
Multithread
i7-6820HQ
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
48.5k
25.04k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
77.02k
24.7k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.3k
9.29k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.24k
5.06k (x0.97)
TOTAL
152.06k
64.09k (x0.42)
Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1711 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
3379 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3205 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4635 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2020 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
11114 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4