Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.1 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.1 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a50f00
Core
Skylake-H
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2015
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
21.2k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
25k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
11.44k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
24.22k (x3.94)
TOTAL
50.1k
81.87k (x1.63)
Multithread
i7-6820HQ
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
145.13k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
198.36k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
85.67k (x4.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
5.79k (x0.92)
TOTAL
205.89k
434.96k (x2.11)
Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4