Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a50f00
Core
Skylake-H
Barcelo
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2015
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
18.57k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
22.03k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
9.55k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
20.5k (x3.33)
TOTAL
50.1k
70.65k (x1.41)
Multithread
i7-6820HQ
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
92.92k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
128.4k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
54.82k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
5.13k (x0.81)
TOTAL
205.89k
281.26k (x1.37)
Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4