Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
14.58k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
23.98k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
5.35k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
6.34k (x1.03)
TOTAL
50.1k
50.25k (x1)
Multithread
i7-6820HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
57.37k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
107.03k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
28.9k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
7.05k (x1.12)
TOTAL
205.89k
200.34k (x0.97)
Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4