Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.3 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.3 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f10
Core
Skylake-H
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2015
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
13.75k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
22.58k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
4.99k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
3.55k (x0.58)
TOTAL
50.1k
44.87k (x0.9)
Multithread
i7-6820HQ
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
50.99k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
84.4k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
18.95k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
3.2k (x0.51)
TOTAL
205.89k
157.54k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4