| | | |

Core i7-6820HQ vs FX 8350


Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 159.7 k points while the 8350 gets 117.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.4 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
600f20
Core
Skylake-H
Vishera
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2015
October 2012

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
11784
9847 (-16.44%)
Test#2 (FP)
18056
8418 (-53.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4479
3576 (-20.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7117
6267 (-11.95%)
TOTAL
41437
28107 (-32.17%)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

8350
Test#1 (Integers)
49458
44810 (-9.40%)
Test#2 (FP)
84798
45461 (-46.39%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20703
22736 (9.82%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4770
4898 (2.67%)
TOTAL
159730
117904 (-26.19%)

Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1099 points/W
358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1884 points/W
364 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
3550 points/W
943 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3273 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5016 points/GHz
2053 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1244 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1977 points/GHz
1528 points/GHz
TOTAL
11510 points/GHz
6855 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8